
“Which personal style should managers adopt to ensure success? What is the most effective approach to managing the work of subordinates? These questions have been extensively researched and debated over the last century, and while the general consensus has moved away from ‘command and control’ to management and leadership towards more consultative and participative approaches, there is no single ideal, as the best approach may vary according to circumstances and individual characteristics” (CMI 2013).
Similarities & differences between “Leadership & Management” concepts
Both concepts are closely related and similar as they both have designated person of authority, both are innovative, highly knowledgeable, organized, clear communicators, open to change, and excellent in delegating tasks and identifying talents (Locander, et. al, 2007).
However, leadership focuses on change rather than stability, leading people rather than managing work, seeking vision rather than objective, setting direction rather than planning details, facilitating decisions rather than making them (Kotter, 1990).
As per Manferd’s argument (2003) management focuses on the present while leadership looks toward the long-term future, and management is about control while leadership is about delegating the right task to the right people (Weathersby, 1999).
Moreover, management is about using the rationale and asking “What” & “How” with following procedures, in the contrary leadership is about trusting intuition, asking “Why” & “What”, and engages in a vision.
In addition to that, management plans & budgets, organize staff, control problems, and do things right. However, leadership establishes direction, aligns staff, motivation, guide, and do the right things (Schruijer and Vansina, 1999).
LEADERSHIP STYLES

There are many different leadership styles, one of these are Lewin’s leadership styles. He explored three styles of leadership: autocratic, democratic and laissez faire. Autocratic leadership style means when a leader doesn’t support any contribution of others in making decisions, the followers are only expected to follow the instructions. While democratic leadership style is the way opposite, the democratic leaders always encourage the teams members or subordinates to participate in decision making as well as setting objectives, after considering their opinions and ideas then the leaders take a decision. The third style, laissez-faire is completely decentralized way of leading, as the workers are given high level of freedom and flexibility to make decisions and implement the tasks the way they want (Dessler& Philips, 2008).
On the other hand, Daniel Goleman developed a framework consists of six emotional leadership styles.

The illustration above shows those six leadership styles. The four styles of these considering visionary, democratic, Affiliative and coaching encourage consonance and positive consequences. For example: visionary style is mostly used when a new vision needed, the leader can tell the followers where they need to go or in which direction but giving the freedom of choice of how they want to reach to that direction. Whereas commanding and pacesetting styles cause stress and must be applied in particular situations (Goleman, Boyatzis and MacKee, 2003). For example, commanding or coercive style is needed during crisis.
Goleman and his co-authors suggest that it is always a leader can use a mixture of different leadership styles according to situation. Therefore, the model is very effective because it allows the leader to consider suitable style in different circumstances. However, the model is somehow complicated and very specified, which let the leaders keep changing styles according to the situations, and also it doesn’t necessarily all styles align with leader’s personal characteristics.
Most effective approach to managing the work of subordinates
Nowadays management and leadership are connected and not separated; employees tend to argue if they are assigned a task, and need to be explained the purpose. Traditionally, managers possess subordinates whereas leaders have followers that they mentor and guide. While in modern days employees aspire authorized person to identify their talents and motivate them to achieve best bottom-line as explained by the management guru Peter Drucker (1990) where he clarified that the task is to lead people; and the goal is to enhance productivity by identifying the strength and weaknesses of every individual. The approach to manage the work of subordinates is varied according to how the person of power perceives himself, the circumstances, and need (CMI, 2013). Goleman’s model is a good example of leading people by considering the situations. Furthermore, French and Raven also described different types of powers where leaders can use to influence others.
▪ Legitimate power: Members agree to comply with the rules and directions from leaders
▪ Reward power: Stems from formal authority to allocate resources and rewards
▪ Coercive power: Is based on authority over punishments
▪ Referent power: Derived from the desire of others to please an agent towards whom they have strong feelings
▪ Expert power: This is a source of power if others are dependent on the agent for advise
(Adapted from Yukl 2013:191-195).
Overall, it is difficult to identify which style is more appropriate, as Goleman described it depends on the situations as there should alignment between the style and the eventuality. Or referring to the power of a leader has, and when certain type of power should be used.
CMI 2013, Do I agree or disagree? Why?
Referring to the point of view of CMI (2013), I believe that roles of management and leadership should be separated. Hence every organization need a firm person to respect their judgment and a looser person to go back to seek for help.
It is more appropriate to change leadership style according to the situation. As in certain departments such as the call-center in airline industry it is acceptable to be flexible in scheduling slots, because the main objective is to have adequate staff to serve 24/7 as the case of most airline operations. However, departments such as crew relations; it is highly recommended to have an autocratic leader that can control the efficiency and punctuality of flight crew members due to the fixed flight schedules.

How would I like to be led?
Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, she is the one who guided wisely her country during many hard times, such as the recession and many other political challenges. It is often said that Merkel is the most powerful woman in the world, and the good thing is that she uses her power towards humanity all over the world not only in her country. I am inspired the most with her modest leadership style which can aligned with Goleman’s leadership styles, leading people and taking into consideration the circumstances, being autocratic when needed and democratic at the right time. Her good leadership styles led Germany to the success, development and growth.
Meanwhile, the impact of bad leadership styles can lead to negative outcomes. For example Jeff Smisek whose well-known of being one of the worst CEOs in the airline industry in general and United Airlines in particular. He led the company to huge losses and high turnover because of many bankruptcy issues and considering self-interest above the company and employees interests.
Management and leadership are better to be combined considering different situations and conditions instead of distinguishing between the two types of managing people to maintain organizational success and growth.
References:
Dessler, G. and Philips, J. (2008) Managing now. 1stedn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. and McKee, A. (2003) The New Leaders:Transforming the Art of Leadership Into the Science of Results. Harvard Business School Press
Yukl, G. (2013) Leadership in Organisations.7thedn. Harlow: Pearson Education